Screenimage: The Guardian.

The events of the past five days around the country are a sobering sight for people around the United Kingdom. Rioting has been widespread and in amongst some of the abhorrent stories that have filtered through news agencies and social networks such as Twitter and Facebook, message and stories of hope have trickled through too. Signs of solidarity in London with residents of areas cleaning up their own areas with brooms and applauding police cars driving through areas that now look like warzones are a relieving sight after days of trouble. Events like this have been organised for surrounding areas such as Birmingham, Bristol, West Bromwich and Wolverhampton and this community spirit is an unexpected side effect of this rioting. The most remarkable of these stories surely has to be that of Sangat TV, a Midlands-based Sikh television channel broadcasting on Sky channel 847 and the internet, which took to the streets on two nights of rioting around Birmingham and the Black Country as well as areas of London, armed only with a van and a camera.

Despite covering the events on the 8th August when rioting began in Birmingham, it was the night after that showed some of the most gripping and emotional live television ever shown on British screens. Sangat took television to another level, one that the bigger broadcasters such as the BBC and Sky seemed almost reluctant to broadcast in amongst more ‘juicy’ stories they favoured instead. The rawness of such a small crew filming events that Sky for example would not was incredible. The low budget nature of the channel – note, their adverts on a continuous loop – and of some of the interviews that were conducted, often from within cars with members of various religions in the middle of the night was staggering in a way that cannot be described. Sangat were able to broadcast live on the move to areas where they had heard there was trouble in the West Midlands.

Within only a few minutes, they could access Wolverhampton from Birmingham, somewhere that had suffered with violence throughout the day and was now seeing the trouble enter the night with looting still rife and reports of the violence failing to cease continuing. Sangat could access these areas and broadcast them live to an eager audience that had grown due to its presence being spread on social networks. What was once a small Sikh television station was now pushing the boundaries of live television journalism and reporting on stories as they happened in real time before Sky and BBC were able to.

Arguably this reached its peak when the cameras and presenter Uphinder Randhawa arrived at Dudley City Hospital in the early hours of the 10th August where local muslims had gathered due to news filtering of three local muslims being run over by rioters. This really reached its peak when footage of one of the brothers of the victims stormed out of the hospital in an emotional rage, having to be restrained by the crowd that had gathered outside. It was truly emotionally gripping television and wasn’t to be missed.

If there was an area to criticise Sangat TV, it would be very hard, but often there would be long sections where Randhawa would become increasingly more and more angry at other news agencies. The way they reported on the events wasn’t news-like and that was part of its charm but at times these impassioned rants became almost cringeworthy. There’s no doubt that they all did a lot of good, but for example, criticising Sky News and shouting loudly in front of a crowd of grieving members of the community that Sky reporters don’t deserve their money for not reporting fast enough didn’t seem substantiated. Sky and other news agencies have to abide by OFCOM’s laws and regulations and reporting on things that have yet to be reported as final, such as the three murders we have seen today in the Winson Green area of Birmingham, should have a good amount of confirmation before being reported on a national and international scale. Randhawa would do well to remember this instead of perhaps riding on his own viral success.

In conclusion, Sangat TV was fantastic and still happens to be fantastic. Reporting on riots can be hard when they’re so dispersed as we’ve seen in the past few days and their ability to give a willing audience pictures and more to the point proof of what was happening in their local areas when tensions were high was fantastic.

Image: Unique Events.

Formula 1 in the UK is entirely dependant on ratings in order to bring in the advertising money to supplement the expensive team sport. For at least the last 40 years, the sport has worked like this. We all know why the Sky deal has happened today and that’s because of money and the spurious nature of the license fee. No longer can the BBC justify the money it costs to buy the rights to the sport in times of austerity, which is all well and good, but when you look at the other sports that they continue to buy, it starts to become puzzling why they’d drop a popular sport like Formula 1 to only 9 or 10 races a season when they buy Open Golf rights for the next 6 years, or rights to the Rugby League Challenge cup. Indeed, the sports rights list that the BBC currently owns reads like an expensive Christmas list.

It’s not that I don’t think that these other sports that I mention are unworthy; I’m not naive enough to suggest that Rugby League for example doesn’t merit a big enough fanbase in order for their showpiece final to be shown, but in the grand scale of things, compared to Formula 1 which often gets 6-8 million viewers, other sports that cost just as much cannot be justified given today’s announcement. So why do I believe that Formula 1 on the BBC is worth protecting? It’s simple. When certain sports move to Sky Sports, the company treats them well and gives them professional coverage that’s in depth and informative, whilst being attractive and glossy without resorting to the American-style ESPN-ness that some have come to expect. Simply speaking, Sky Sports is fantastic because it does television sport coverage right.

There are two problems with this however, ratings and what the BBC already offers. The Formula 1 coverage on the BBC is already in depth and informative, it has a great young presenter in Jake Humphrey, fantastic commentary by former Formula 1 drivers Martin Brundle and David Coulthard, to the minute reporting from Lee McKenzie and Ted Kravitz as well as being given priority and stunning coverage in High Definition on the BBC One HD channel. The BBC already puts F1 at the forefront of its live sporting coverage and its delivery has been superb and on a whole different level to the previous rights-holders ITV whose coverage was lax and even interrupted live coverage to screen adverts, often at exciting points of a race.

With the above in mind, that draws me back to my original points; what on earth can Sky Sports offer viewers of F1 (who bear in mind, are used to free coverage of the sport) when they already have amazing coverage on the BBC? Sky Sports comes at a premium and given the scheduling of races at weekends, Sky may even relegate the coverage of qualifying on a Saturday to Sky Sports 2, ditto with the main race on a Sunday if it comes against a lunchtime or evening kick off of a football match, which arguably, Sky will argue would be more important. For this reason, Sky cannot offer the same level of coverage that the sport has been used to since its televised inception. There’s no doubt that Sky Sports will dedicate a great deal amount of money and time to Formula 1, but Bernie will have to get used to the fact that for the first time in the UK, half of the races will be shown on a channel that won’t give the sport priority. What does this mean for fans? Well apart from the fact that Sky may let Formula 1 become victim to haphazard scheduling, they really have little to no incentive for fans to invest a great deal of money into subscribing to watch the sport.

If the BBC are showing half of the races a season until 2018, then why would anyone in their right mind pay for Sky Sports to watch the rest? It just doesn’t make sense, it’s pricing the loyal fans out of an already expensive sport. The magic will be lost forever if this happens to continue. If Bernie wanted Formula 1 to become a premium sport like football has become in this country – whereby you have to pay in order to watch the most high-profile matches – then he’s about 25 years late off the mark. Formula 1 already has a fanbase and fantastic coverage elsewhere, and I’m not naive enough to assume that it couldn’t be a little bit better, but moving most races to a pay TV operator just will not work and I predict that this will be detrimental to the sport in this country. At the end of the day, Formula 1 doesn’t need Sky Sports, and in a way, Sky Sports doesn’t need Formula 1. It’s not like darts or speedway, two sports in particular that have become reliant on the coverage and money that Sky Sports brings in to keep the sport going professionally.

Formula 1 is already a sport driven by money, but it has an affinity with its fans that is unlike any other sport. Football seems to have lost its way with massive transfers and the whole endeavour becoming somewhat of a soap opera year-round, but Formula 1 is about passion, skill and strategy. Unfortunately, I can’t see this deal panning out too well and it would be wise of Bernie to keep his mouth firmly shut at this moment in time, because financially, he’s let the sport go to owners who aren’t necessarily going to make it any better than what it already is. There’s absolutely no evidence to suggest that F1′s audience will grow with Sky as Bernie seems to be saying. If any race on Sky Sports reached the lofty heights of 8 million viewers as seen with Jenson’s amazing win in Canada, then that would make it the most popular sporting event Sky have ever shown on their premium sports channels. Therefore it’s insane to say that this deal was brought in for fans, because it clearly wasn’t. It’s yet another move brought in by Bernie that’s garnered by greed. It’s sorry to see it go, because the BBC’s coverage has even won a BAFTA in the past.

But never mind, we can always watch Open Golf, or the Commonwealth Games, the Grand National or the Rugby League Challenge Cup. Oh remind me, where are all their BAFTA’s?

Follow along with tonight’s episode!

Tonight we’ll be live-blogging the entirety of the penultimate episode of this series of The Apprentice over on Twitter at @Revoltingly. We’d love for you to join us.

Image: The 24.7 News.

The Kennedy’s, the controversial drama miniseries that History made in the US, then passed up on began on Friday night on BBC Two. With a small promotional campaign highlighting quality US drama and playing on History’s passing of the series, I expected to find a rather refined, historically accurate and gripping drama. Well some of that is right.

I found the writing to be rather haphazard and in parts it felt as if the bits of dialogue were randomly put together. Historically, I’m no expert on the Kennedy’s having done my GCSE on JFK rather a long time ago, but History’s refusal to broadcast the series on historical inaccurate grounds made me wonder if all of this was rather a lost cause. The acting however is fantastic, as is to be expected by a cable production in the US. Greg Kinnear’s portrayal of the late John F. Kennedy is outstanding and Katie Holmes’s performance of Jackie Kennedy is sublime.

Kinnear’s accent in particular is second to none, however the series opener raised my eyebrows on occasion. The scene is set on election day 1960 before jumping backwards nearly 40 years, then back again and so on. This is by no means a Pulp Fiction sort of narrative, therefore I felt the use of a non linear narrative in this instance was not needed and proved to be more of a gimmick if anything, in the same vein that (500) Days of Summer did this a few years back.

This is however, just the opening episode of the series and there looks to be more to stick around for in the 8 episode run.

Image: Channel 4

8 Out of 10 Cats returned on Friday minus Jason Manford who left the series at the beginning of May to focus on projects on rival network, ITV. His replacement, Jon Richardson, pictured above right, suited the role fantastically and provided in my opinion, more laughs than Manford whose brand of comedy has waned on the typical of late. Richardson’s sharp wry humour and banter exchanged with Sean Lock made for entertaining viewing and a sign that should this continue, he’ll be around for a while yet. The career of Richardson is on the up after he left 6Music to focus on his comedy career and by this evidence, this was a wise move.

Alex Reid guested on the show and was the butt of many of Jimmy Carr’s jokes, which was hilarious as Reid is usually rather game for a laugh on these sorts of shows as can be seen on the last series of Shooting Stars. Russell Kane told a rather unbelievable story about a time when he offended a fan on a train and Rachel Riley provided an anecdote about Ryan Giggs, managing to remain topical and on topic all at once. Well done to her.

This series looks like it will be as sharp as ever and the show shows no signs of ending yet.

Image: Channel 4

King Of.. is a new comedy chat show on Friday nights on Channel 4, fronted by the very lovely Claudia Winkleman. The basic premise of the show is to bring on some celebrity guests who then decide what is the King of various subjects along with the members of those subjects that they hate.

So, for example, in deciding the King of holidays, we found out that Claudia hates skiing, based in no small part because she doesn’t like the cold or lifts with no walls, and that guest Sarah Millican doesn’t like cruises because “they go down a lot”. Hmm, cue innuendo-based giggles from the audience.

It’s not in many programmes however, that you get to see a pregnant Claudia Winkleman with two black eyes get chased by a penguin whilst Chris Evans giggles. But then again we did witness nearly a minute of a mouse sniffing various cheeses. Not the best idea for television in the world. I like Claudia Winkleman, I like Sarah Millican, I’m not fussed about Chris Evans but I can’t see this getting a second series.

Image: BBC.

Breaking into Britain was a gritty portrayal showing how hard it is for illegal immigrants to enter Britain’s borders. The documentary followed two journalists, one starting in Nigeria and the other in Afghanistan, following the lives at various stages of illegal immigrants travelling through Asia and Africa, to Britain.

Evan Davis, pictured above in a slightly ominous but strangely hilarious promo shot for Breaking into Britain, narrates the whole endeavour, making it feel like a surreal Dragons Den where failure to pitch your idea results in being beaten, raped or murdered. Along the way, we learn of the terrible hardship of some of these immigrants, but there is a different struggle that isn’t always documented.

Greece, a country that has now become inundated with illegal immigrants, simply cannot cope with the number of Europe bound immigrants. So much so that it’s prepared to just let the majority of them into the country to sleep rough.

The documentary makes for some uneasy viewing and the conclusion it comes to is very broad; the EU needs to do something. But we don’t quite know what.

Link: BBC iPlayer.

Image: BBC.

Only a day after announcing these plans for a deeper interactive television service, the BBC announce their first venture, a product for BBC News.

The service will firstly be rolled out onto Samsung’s ‘Smart TV’ range of television’s before being rolled out to more devices over time. The BBC describes this as necessary as by 2016, it’s expected that there will be over 36 million internet-connected TV’s in the UK.

Designed to compliment the BBC News channel, the new service aims to provide extra information to stories that are broadcast through the use of an internet connection. For example, as above, where a news story is playing about protests to Greek reforms, a menu can be brought up to view more on this story, as well as other stories.

In a nutshell, the service aims to tie in the extensive content and power of the BBC News website with the convenience and ease of use of a red button service.

If you have a Samsung Smart TV, you can begin to use this service from today. Other devices will roll out soon.

Link: BBC Press Office, The Guardian.

Image: That Grape Juice.

The Voice (not the afro-Caribbean newspaper or the American version above) is coming to Britain! No word on who’s going to be the judges yet but what we do know is that the BBC have bought the rights. Could this be a worthy competitor to The X Factor? Who knows. No word on when it’s set to launch yet, either.

Here’s a brief rundown of the format, kindly presented by Auntie Beeb:

The series consists of three phases: a blind audition, a battle phase and live performance shows. Four judges/coaches, all famous musicians, will choose teams of contestants through a blind audition process. Each judge has the length of the auditionee’s performance to decide if he or she wants that singer on his or her team; if two or more judges want the same singer then the singer gets to choose which coach they want to work with.

“Each team of singers will be mentored and developed by their coach. In the second stage, coaches will have two of their team members battle against each other by singing the same song, with the coach choosing which team member will advance to the next stage.

In the final phase, the remaining contestants will compete against each other in live broadcasts. The television audience will help to decide who moves on. When one team member remains for each coach, the contestants will compete against each other in the finale.”

Doesn’t it just sound fantastic?!

Link: BBC Press Office.

Image: Channel 4/Metro.

Wouldn’t it be funny if you got Robert Webb to narrate a ‘documentary’ in three parts about sex and arousal and men and women and feature little kitsch cartoon’s describing the profession of being a “sex researcher” over the decades and get as many camera glances at porn images as you can?

Clearly whoever pitched The Sex Researchers to Channel 4 thought so. The commissioning editor must have agreed, as well cause it started last night and it’s a three part series. Airing a 10pm, Channel 4 masterfully captivated the late evening pervert audience rather well and the first half didn’t disappoint. In order to survey how men and women are aroused, we see tests carried out between the two genders.

First of all we witness a scientist (let’s call them ‘boffins’ from now on) informing a man that he needs to insert a small elastic band midway down his penis whilst he watches images of monkeys having sex, a landscape, gay pornography and then straight pornography. The boffins then analysed how much his penis grew according to what was featured on screen.

Hmm, great opener! And of course, Robert Webb’s expert comedic narration strikes through and you get the feeling that in amongst this serious boffin behaviour, there’s an underlying chance for him to just take the piss with his sarcastic tone in what he’s being forced to read out cause his career’s not gone as well as David Mitchell’s.

Of course the boffins need to find out how women are aroused too and perverts out there won’t be disappointed to learn that the same test as above is carried out with a female, but this time she has to insert a rather ominous-looking glass probe into her vagina. Ouch! The female subject however, seemed to find every act of sex she saw on screen arousing according to her vagina, but not according to the remote control they were given to say whether they were aroused or not. Huff, women!*

Overall I felt this made for rather entertaining viewing, because by the end of the hour, it seemed Robert Webb had pretty much given up and knew he was getting paid whatever he said. He could have said “Smarties get stuck in my teeth easier than Minstrels” and the bulk of the audience (one presumes men) probably wouldn’t  have told the difference.

Link: 4OD.

*I’m not sexist, that was a joke.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.