Archives for posts with tag: BBC

Image: Unique Events.

Formula 1 in the UK is entirely dependant on ratings in order to bring in the advertising money to supplement the expensive team sport. For at least the last 40 years, the sport has worked like this. We all know why the Sky deal has happened today and that’s because of money and the spurious nature of the license fee. No longer can the BBC justify the money it costs to buy the rights to the sport in times of austerity, which is all well and good, but when you look at the other sports that they continue to buy, it starts to become puzzling why they’d drop a popular sport like Formula 1 to only 9 or 10 races a season when they buy Open Golf rights for the next 6 years, or rights to the Rugby League Challenge cup. Indeed, the sports rights list that the BBC currently owns reads like an expensive Christmas list.

It’s not that I don’t think that these other sports that I mention are unworthy; I’m not naive enough to suggest that Rugby League for example doesn’t merit a big enough fanbase in order for their showpiece final to be shown, but in the grand scale of things, compared to Formula 1 which often gets 6-8 million viewers, other sports that cost just as much cannot be justified given today’s announcement. So why do I believe that Formula 1 on the BBC is worth protecting? It’s simple. When certain sports move to Sky Sports, the company treats them well and gives them professional coverage that’s in depth and informative, whilst being attractive and glossy without resorting to the American-style ESPN-ness that some have come to expect. Simply speaking, Sky Sports is fantastic because it does television sport coverage right.

There are two problems with this however, ratings and what the BBC already offers. The Formula 1 coverage on the BBC is already in depth and informative, it has a great young presenter in Jake Humphrey, fantastic commentary by former Formula 1 drivers Martin Brundle and David Coulthard, to the minute reporting from Lee McKenzie and Ted Kravitz as well as being given priority and stunning coverage in High Definition on the BBC One HD channel. The BBC already puts F1 at the forefront of its live sporting coverage and its delivery has been superb and on a whole different level to the previous rights-holders ITV whose coverage was lax and even interrupted live coverage to screen adverts, often at exciting points of a race.

With the above in mind, that draws me back to my original points; what on earth can Sky Sports offer viewers of F1 (who bear in mind, are used to free coverage of the sport) when they already have amazing coverage on the BBC? Sky Sports comes at a premium and given the scheduling of races at weekends, Sky may even relegate the coverage of qualifying on a Saturday to Sky Sports 2, ditto with the main race on a Sunday if it comes against a lunchtime or evening kick off of a football match, which arguably, Sky will argue would be more important. For this reason, Sky cannot offer the same level of coverage that the sport has been used to since its televised inception. There’s no doubt that Sky Sports will dedicate a great deal amount of money and time to Formula 1, but Bernie will have to get used to the fact that for the first time in the UK, half of the races will be shown on a channel that won’t give the sport priority. What does this mean for fans? Well apart from the fact that Sky may let Formula 1 become victim to haphazard scheduling, they really have little to no incentive for fans to invest a great deal of money into subscribing to watch the sport.

If the BBC are showing half of the races a season until 2018, then why would anyone in their right mind pay for Sky Sports to watch the rest? It just doesn’t make sense, it’s pricing the loyal fans out of an already expensive sport. The magic will be lost forever if this happens to continue. If Bernie wanted Formula 1 to become a premium sport like football has become in this country – whereby you have to pay in order to watch the most high-profile matches – then he’s about 25 years late off the mark. Formula 1 already has a fanbase and fantastic coverage elsewhere, and I’m not naive enough to assume that it couldn’t be a little bit better, but moving most races to a pay TV operator just will not work and I predict that this will be detrimental to the sport in this country. At the end of the day, Formula 1 doesn’t need Sky Sports, and in a way, Sky Sports doesn’t need Formula 1. It’s not like darts or speedway, two sports in particular that have become reliant on the coverage and money that Sky Sports brings in to keep the sport going professionally.

Formula 1 is already a sport driven by money, but it has an affinity with its fans that is unlike any other sport. Football seems to have lost its way with massive transfers and the whole endeavour becoming somewhat of a soap opera year-round, but Formula 1 is about passion, skill and strategy. Unfortunately, I can’t see this deal panning out too well and it would be wise of Bernie to keep his mouth firmly shut at this moment in time, because financially, he’s let the sport go to owners who aren’t necessarily going to make it any better than what it already is. There’s absolutely no evidence to suggest that F1′s audience will grow with Sky as Bernie seems to be saying. If any race on Sky Sports reached the lofty heights of 8 million viewers as seen with Jenson’s amazing win in Canada, then that would make it the most popular sporting event Sky have ever shown on their premium sports channels. Therefore it’s insane to say that this deal was brought in for fans, because it clearly wasn’t. It’s yet another move brought in by Bernie that’s garnered by greed. It’s sorry to see it go, because the BBC’s coverage has even won a BAFTA in the past.

But never mind, we can always watch Open Golf, or the Commonwealth Games, the Grand National or the Rugby League Challenge Cup. Oh remind me, where are all their BAFTA’s?

Image: BBC.

Breaking into Britain was a gritty portrayal showing how hard it is for illegal immigrants to enter Britain’s borders. The documentary followed two journalists, one starting in Nigeria and the other in Afghanistan, following the lives at various stages of illegal immigrants travelling through Asia and Africa, to Britain.

Evan Davis, pictured above in a slightly ominous but strangely hilarious promo shot for Breaking into Britain, narrates the whole endeavour, making it feel like a surreal Dragons Den where failure to pitch your idea results in being beaten, raped or murdered. Along the way, we learn of the terrible hardship of some of these immigrants, but there is a different struggle that isn’t always documented.

Greece, a country that has now become inundated with illegal immigrants, simply cannot cope with the number of Europe bound immigrants. So much so that it’s prepared to just let the majority of them into the country to sleep rough.

The documentary makes for some uneasy viewing and the conclusion it comes to is very broad; the EU needs to do something. But we don’t quite know what.

Link: BBC iPlayer.

Image: BBC.

Only a day after announcing these plans for a deeper interactive television service, the BBC announce their first venture, a product for BBC News.

The service will firstly be rolled out onto Samsung’s ‘Smart TV’ range of television’s before being rolled out to more devices over time. The BBC describes this as necessary as by 2016, it’s expected that there will be over 36 million internet-connected TV’s in the UK.

Designed to compliment the BBC News channel, the new service aims to provide extra information to stories that are broadcast through the use of an internet connection. For example, as above, where a news story is playing about protests to Greek reforms, a menu can be brought up to view more on this story, as well as other stories.

In a nutshell, the service aims to tie in the extensive content and power of the BBC News website with the convenience and ease of use of a red button service.

If you have a Samsung Smart TV, you can begin to use this service from today. Other devices will roll out soon.

Link: BBC Press Office, The Guardian.

Image: That Grape Juice.

The Voice (not the afro-Caribbean newspaper or the American version above) is coming to Britain! No word on who’s going to be the judges yet but what we do know is that the BBC have bought the rights. Could this be a worthy competitor to The X Factor? Who knows. No word on when it’s set to launch yet, either.

Here’s a brief rundown of the format, kindly presented by Auntie Beeb:

The series consists of three phases: a blind audition, a battle phase and live performance shows. Four judges/coaches, all famous musicians, will choose teams of contestants through a blind audition process. Each judge has the length of the auditionee’s performance to decide if he or she wants that singer on his or her team; if two or more judges want the same singer then the singer gets to choose which coach they want to work with.

“Each team of singers will be mentored and developed by their coach. In the second stage, coaches will have two of their team members battle against each other by singing the same song, with the coach choosing which team member will advance to the next stage.

In the final phase, the remaining contestants will compete against each other in live broadcasts. The television audience will help to decide who moves on. When one team member remains for each coach, the contestants will compete against each other in the finale.”

Doesn’t it just sound fantastic?!

Link: BBC Press Office.

Mock the Week’s tenth series continued last night with Chris Addison returning from last week. I quite like Chris Addison, especially in The Thick of It and on the Direct Line adverts but on Mock the Week continuously, I find him rather grating. Micky Flanagan was back this week and he’s always very happy and very funny and this week was no exception. Listen out for his distinct laugh. Instead of Mock the Week being a competition as it was before, now it’s more of a forum for comedy which I quite like and Micky doesn’t take himself too seriously which is even better.

Diane Morgan joined Ed Byrne this week, too. I’ve mentioned briefly my love for Ed Byrne before and this time last year I fully supported him in his Twitter war with joke stealer extraordinaire Keith “Cheggers” Chegwin. Diane Morgan though is something of a new comedian on the scene. Bringing her incredibly dry humour to the show as well as her Northern wit, I felt she was overshadowed somewhat by the big personalities of the panel.

Dara O’Briain was as sharp as ever and he really is becoming a big player on the comedy and entertainment scene with his witty interceptions and contributions. ‘Scenes we’d like to see’ this week was a bit of a let down so if you only watch the show for that, might be worth giving this week’s episode a miss. All in all though, it’s good to see that the series is progressing and shows no signs of wearing thin after its high profile fall out with Frankie Boyle.

Link: BBC iPlayer.

Image: BBC.

This week, BBC Two’s Wonderland series screened the gripping and unbelievable stories of children who set fire to items around their home and elsewhere. The hour-long documentary followed Liam, above, Ryan and Hulya, all of whom start fires on a regular basis. The documentary makers followed the three children as they met with fire officers in order to tackle the problem.

What I found after watching was just the sheer disbelief that some of these children could be so arrogant and not admit to the gravity of what they were doing. Liam seemed to think he was invincible for example and seemed convinced he could always escape should one of his fires burn out of control. But it wasn’t just that ignorance that shocked me, it was the behaviour of some of these children. Hulya for example seemed completely defiant in her belief that she will never get along with her Mother and this showed quite clearly in the arguments they had on camera. Everything was a battle and in a way, it was the same for all the kids featured.

What I’m not saying is that this is an issue that cannot be resolved or that it doesn’t happen, but tougher measures need to be taken not just on the children themselves but on the parents who’re meant to be leading them away from behaviour like this. It’s one thing for the documentary to more or less assume by the end that this needs to be helped with talking and slowly resolving the issue at first hand but more often than not, the parents of these children, especially in Hulya’s case, seemed to come across as just as difficult as she was.

It’s a typical grown up sentiment to shift the blame onto the children themselves but this hour really opened my eyes to a different viewpoint, something I think the makers achieved rather well. There’s always more than one opinion on matters and this highlighted that area incredibly well. It was an excellent documentary and I wholeheartedly recommend watching it on iPlayer if you haven’t already.

Link: BBC iPlayer.

Image: ITV.

Richard Hammond journey’s to the centre of the earth, apparently.
According to the BBC, later this summer in a two-part series, Hammond will do this “using state of the art technology..peeling back the layers to reveal a machine more complex than anything else in the solar system. A giant 3D virtual earth brings together the latest scientific information from across the world – satellite maps, and sonar and radar images – to show us what’s happening beneath our feet in a way we’ve never seen before.” Until Google bring out ‘Google Centre of the Earth’.

When asked presumably by a BBC runner or PR woman what he thought about all of this, Hammond replied: “In making this show I learned that our planet is far, far from being an inert lump of rock that we live on; it has a vital, dynamic role to play in defining and enabling our existence. People talk about going on a ‘journey’ in TV shows: well this has to be the ultimate such journey, not only across and around our world but deep into it. It’s a journey that changed the way I think about the earth beneath our feet and I hope it does the same for the BBC One audience.” Or showbiz hyperbolic jargon, then?

The series is produced by a joint ‘collabo’ of BBC Worldwide, BBC Scotland and Discovery. It’ll air later this summer. Also until the end of time on Discovery Space or whatever it’s called.

More here.

Cookery goes interactive on BBC One. Executive explains it really is a good idea.
Remember QR codes and how they’re a good idea but they’ve never really taken off because wireless technologies are more convenient and augmented reality seemed like a good idea but it actually was embarrassingly post-modern in the bad way? Well no one told the BBC that. Simon Hopkinson, chef and I’m guessing part time android, will be presenting this strange BBC gimmick of a cookery show whereby QR codes will pop up on screen with information about recipes and so forth ready to be sucked into your mobile telephony device should you have one.

The press release remains remarkably vague and doesn’t really give much information to what the show will actually be like other than the QR codes. Seems like a pretty good way to alienate a good chunk of your audience because they don’t have the codes. Surely as well, if you watched on iPlayer that means most of the time you’re in front of a computer. This just proves that the BBC think that people are too lazy to google ingredients and would prefer instead, to whip out their iPhone and take a picture of a QR code instead.

The programme will be called “The Good Cook” and will air in July.

More here.

The Marriage Ref. Does the ‘ref’ stand for referee or referral?
Jerry Seinfeld’s programme from the States invades these shores beginning this Saturday with Dermot O’Leary presenting what on first hand looks to be a rather strange affair where couples who argue come onto the show to pitch why their partner is annoying. However you may wonder who these couples will be pitching to. Well each week will feature a celebrity panel. This week’s is Jimmy Carr, Sarah Millican and famous-for-being-ginger, Ginger Spice herself, Geri Halliwell.

Ouch, tough crowd. ITV helpfully points out that “other panellists that will appear throughout the series include Jonathan Ross, James Corden, Denise Van Outen, Jack Dee and Micky Flanagan.” Sounds fantastic..

More here.

Love your garden. Hate your soul for watching.
Alan Titchmarsh is back! What? No cheer? Oh well. Technically this started last week but I’ve been so out of the loop with things (lie) that I kinda sorta missed it. ITV explains: “Rather than sprawling country estates or celebrated public gardens, Alan will focus on the gardens of Britons who have turned their plots into magical outdoor living spaces. And even if you’re not a gardener and have a tiny space, Alan will demonstrate how to make it magical too.”

Way to go Alan! Moving yourself away from the middle class oblivion that is your mediocre and bigoted chat show to show that you do care about the working class and you’re not just an on screen Daily Mail at all! Well done you!

Penn and Teller Fool Us, may explain decent ratings.
Lastly, Penn and Teller are back on British shores for their magic show ‘Fool Us’. Again, for the second series, Jonathan Ross is hosting (groans). The format is very simple. Are you a magician? Yes? Do you think you’re any good? You do? Oh brilliant, come on this show and try and fool Penn and Teller.

Starts this Saturday at 8pm.

More here.

Image: BBC.

Remember The Life of Riley? Oh wait, that’s still going. I don’t know how, either. Well In With the Flynn’s is a lot like that, only with more canned laughter and it’s pre-recorded and not on a live set. In fact, other than those differences, I’d say they’re exactly the same as each other, only In With the Flynn’s is more northern. In fact it’s a lot more northern. It’s as northern as a pie down a coalpit.

The first episode introduces the family, with the Dad being played by WIll Mellor (because of course it would be), the Mum being played by that woman who was in that thing (Niky Wardley), the uncle being played by the bloke who was in Born and Bred and Misfits (Craig Parkinson) and Warren Clarke who was in A Clockwork Orange.

That’s right, A Clockwork Orange. Warren Clarke was in that and 40 years later he’s in this. One of the most renowned films ever made and also one of the most famous. A true British classic, internationally acclaimed and controversial, he’s now in In With the Flynn’s as a Grandad who’s after a younger woman. It is dumbfounding. It’s like Manchester United being relegated in successive seasons to the Blue Square Bet Conference National league.

So, the episode. Will Mellor is worried that he won’t be able to afford the family’s dream holiday to Santorini, but in the mean time we find out Steve, his son, is being bullied at school. Not only that but his daughter Chloe has had her tongue pierced and we all know why people have that done, so the bodily excretions really hit the fan.

What I found with this inaugural half hour of In With the Flynn’s (my apostrophe) is that it made me laugh a lot, rather begrudgingly, I might add. There are a lot of dreadful, lame, non-offensive jokes given its timeslot on a Wednesday night but it’s much better than The Life of Riley which was dreadful. This is just a bit common and working class, not that there’s anything wrong with that in the slightest. It really suits the slot it is given after Waterloo Road, too. In a time where the BBC are trying to cut a lot of middle-class imagery in their sitcoms, as seen in their decision to cut My Family, In With the Flynn’s looks as if it’ll fill the gap to a much wider audience.

Link: BBC iPlayer.

Image: BBC

British Television has become somewhat of an icon internationally. The British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) is still to this day, something of a benchmark for the quality of television worldwide as it’s known for its high production values and standards that are upheld through most (although not all) of its content. However to simply assume that the Beeb is the only area of television that Brits are interested in or view is simply not true. Indeed there are hundreds of channels available in Britain on television but there are only five which make up what used to be known as the ‘terrestrial channels’ as these went out to every television in the country with use of an aerial. Today however, these channels are still called this even though Britain is in the midst of a digital switchover, region by region. Because of their legacy and history for being part of the main channels in the country, the channels still dominate the ratings despite competition from digital channels on the spectrum.

Before we begin to explore each of the terrestrial channels, it’s very important to note  that in Britain in order to watch television at all, you need to own a television license which costs £145.50 ($236.31) for a colour license and £49.00 ($79.58) for a black and white license. A television license in the United Kingdom allows one household to watch television through whichever medium they want. This can be through a television itself, the internet or through cable or satellite. However, if the television you choose to use is only being used for media that is pre-recorded, you do not need to possess a television license.

So where does this money go? Well it would be fair to assume that most of the money collected from television licenses goes to the UK Government, but it doesn’t. Almost all of the money goes to the BBC, which they use to produce its content, whether it be television, radio or even online content such as news. Because of this however, the BBC does not use advertising anywhere in its content. Overall, the total of the television licenses in the UK make up 75% of the BBC’s budget, the rest coming from its commercial wing BBC Worldwide, which sells the BBC’s content internationally for profit.

The BBC gets this money because it is the main UK public service broadcaster and because of this, the BBC has a remit to fulfil. This means that the BBC has to be stringent with its budget and show a wide variety of content given its audience in the country to most of the 60 million people who live in the UK. Therefore, the BBC comes under some scrutiny because of this. The license fee has become expensive and it’s argued by some that the BBC’s content is not suitable or up to scratch for the standards that the country now holds.

It is not just the BBC who is a public service broadcaster, however. Channel 4 is also a public service broadcaster and receives a small amount of the license fee in which to make programmes in the United Kingdom, however, this is is not as much as the BBC and therefore Channel 4 runs advertising on its output in order to garner enough revenue to stay afloat. Out of all the terrestrial channels, both of the BBC’s channels are arguably the biggest, due to their revenue streams.

So, what are the terrestrial channels in the UK? They are, as follows (where number denotes channel number on most televisions):

1) BBC One.
2) BBC Two.
3) ITV1.
4) Channel 4 (England, Scotland, Northern Ireland)/ S4C (Wales).
5) Channel 5 (formerly ‘Five’).

1 and 2) BBC One and BBC Two are the two channels in the UK that are run by the BBC. BBC One is more entertainment-based, in that most of its content is delivered to a wider, broader and bigger audience. This is where primetime drama’s are screened, important live sporting events such as Formula 1 racing, Wimbledon and certain football matches are shown (as well as some events that are deemed important enough that they can only be shown on terrestrial television) and news output.

BBC Two on the other hand is a more niche channel, where comedy and drama are shown that may not reach as wide an audience as on its sister channel BBC One. This channel is also used for programmes that may clash with breaking news events on BBC One or live events that require a larger audience.

3) ITV1 (ITV standing for Independent Television) launched in response to television becoming larger in the early 1950′s and for nearly 30 years, it was the UK’s only commercial broadcaster. ITV1 is not a public service broadcaster, so its role in the British television line up is one that tries to cover everything, whether it be live sport, drama, soaps, news and reality television. ITV1 however, includes advertising whereas none of the BBC’s channels, terrestrial or digital, carry advertising. In recent times, in the opinion of some, ITV’s content has become dumbed down due to the lack of comedy, high productions of crime drama’s and a large amount of reality television such as The X Factor, Britain’s Got Talent and I’m a Celebrity…Get Me Out Of Here!.

4) Channel 4 broadcasts to most of the United Kingdom and is a public service broadcaster, so its output has to be broad and follow the same guidelines as the BBC. Channel 4′s coverage includes drama and comedy, but not as much live sport as ITV or BBC. In Wales however, S4C is broadcast in place of Channel 4. S4C is loosely the same as Channel 4 but is funded in part by the Department of Culture, Media and Sport through grants and advertising. Some of its content is produced by the BBC and is given to S4C free of charge. Because of its financial status and geographical location in Wales, S4C’s content has to be produced, in part, in Welsh.

5) Channel 5 launched in 1997 and became the last terrestrial broadcaster before the advent of digital television. Because of its place on the broadcasting spectrum, thousands missed the launch of the channel because their aerials could not pick up the signal necessary to view the channel. Today, the channel is now owned by media magnate Richard Desmond and most of their content is not made by themselves. Most of their schedule is dedicated to made-for-television films bought in from America as well as Hollywood films on a night.

This article only describes some of what can be read into about British television but it’s safe to assume that most of British television is not supplied solely by the BBC as might be thought internationally.

Vexed is on BBC Two, Sunday’s at 9pm.

Image: BBC (but let’s face it, props go to the person who took the picture of her).

From the writer of Misfits, a programme I enjoy a large amount, comes Vexed. A crime drama, you’d be forgiven for assuming that I’d automatically hate it. But no, oh no, this is a crime drama with a twist. Like some sort of mad professor adding a mystery ingredient to a cancer drug, Vexed adds comedy to the mix, making the whole thing seem light-hearted and almost satirical of the genre in particular.

This arouses my interest. I enjoy things that take the piss out of things I hate. So the hour went disappointingly quickly, with Toby Stephens having possibly the best comic timing I’ve ever encountered. The programme revolves around Lucy Punch being transferred to the city in order to attain a promotion, however she is partnered with the laxidasical Stephens and comedy ensues. Other than that, the whole thing is one massive piss take of these kind of shows.

I can’t think of anything else to say about it. It doesn’t make you think, it’s just like Hot Fuzz but not as good.

Try it, you might like it.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.